​

​

​

​

As the first part in my Origins series, this work offers readers a concise overview of the world’s major writing systems, tracing their evolution from antiquity to the modern era while highlighting their key features.

​

The term ‘writing system’ refers to a system that represents language graphically. It includes a script (a set of symbols) as well as sub-systems for how it represents language such as orthography (spelling, punctuation, etc.) and typography (font, spacing, etc.).¹ The term ‘writing system’ and ‘script’ are, however, often used interchangeably. This piece primarily addresses the origins of scripts. It’s important to keep in mind that not all scripts are simply alphabets. In fact, there is a range of script types including alphabets, abjads, syllabaries, abugidas, and logographies, all of which work completely differently.

​

​​Linguists agree that writing emerged ex nihilo (out of nothing) from four sources (Egypt, Mesopotamia, China and Meso-America), whose respective systems are referred to as ‘pristine’.² While writing as an idea is considered a human invention, in these cases, it emerged essentially “by accident”. The majority of writing systems that have ever existed can be traced back in one way or another to these four pristine systems, being culturally transmitted and evolving organically through small adaptations. Thus, I tend to reserve the term ‘invention’ to constructed writing systems (or neographies) which are defined as those deliberately designed, rather than evolving naturally over time.³

​

But labelling a writing system as ‘constructed’, is a dubious task, especially for older systems. Firstly, because due to the lack of historical record, ascertaining whether the emergence of a trait was consciously conceived or not is near impossible. And secondly, because how we determine “constructedness” is itself contentious. The degree of ingenuity of the inventors of writing (or grammatogenists as they’re termed) is after all on a spectrum, from simply modifying an existing system (e.g. Latin) to the rare cases of fully engineering one “from scratch” (e.g. Korean). And yet, in no instance does a constructed writing system emerge in a complete vacuum without drawing inspiration from existing ones. The label of ‘organic’ or ‘constructed’ can, therefore, only ever be arbitrary.

​

Through the lens of comparative linguistics, I have sought to highlight the work of linguists who have traced the genealogies of writing systems and discovered their fundamental relatedness. I conclude this work by reflecting on the importance of preserving writing systems (just as we strive to protect languages or biological species) for they hold intrinsic value that should not be overlooked. My hope is that this work fosters a renewed appreciation for both the cultural richness embedded in writing systems and the epistemological insights they offer.

​

With a degree in International Studies, a background in teaching and learning languages, and a passion for academic research, my aim is to provide an accessible and digestible overview of the current linguistic material. I have striven for accuracy, and to the extent possible consulted the relevant academic literature (referenced throughout). This work is, however, by no means exhaustive and I do not attempt to offer any linguistic theories of my own.

​

Collapsible glossary, recommended sites and footnotes are included at the end of each chapter.

 

Please do not hesitate to reach out or leave a comment to offer any feedback.

​

I truly hope that you find some value in this work.

​​

[7th July 2025]​